Do note that clustering does not affect your coefficients, only the standard errors. I want to reproduce a Stata code in R and came across a code which seems to be "old" and is therefore not at all familiar to me. Yes. xtreg EDV AnyNALAccessLaw i.year, fe. Thus, before (1) can be estimated, we must place another constraint on the system. Possibly you can take out means for the largest This is what I later do in regressions 3 and 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected. Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to … I want to conduct several regression analyses taking only time fixed effects or only firm fixed effects into account or both. In Stata there is a package called reg2hdfe and reg3hdfe which has been developed by Guimaraes and Portugal (2010). areg y x, absorb(id) The above two codes give the same results. How can I translate it in R? I am an Economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, DC. Question about xtreg vs reghdfe in how they handle multicolinearity. I have a panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects. An dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the others. My research interests include Banking and Corporate Finance; with a focus on banking competition and how it relates to consumer and firm credit access. xtreg’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom > is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group > transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the > observations for any given group are in the same cluster), as is > commonly the case (e.g., firm fixed effects are nested within firm, > industry, or state clusters). To download either program, simply type the following command once in Stata ... As discussed above in the context of AREG vs. XTREG, this adjustment is only applied when … reghdfe is a generalization of areg (and xtreg,fe, xtivreg,fe) for multiple levels of fixed effects (including heterogeneous slopes), alternative estimators (2sls, gmm2s, liml), and additional robust standard errors (multi-way clustering, HAC standard errors, etc). So the problem arises only when only using time fixed effects. xtreg with its various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets. So the problem arises only when only using time fixed effects. ... 先に結論を述べておくと、reghdfeを使うべきであるということです。 何より便 … Any constraint will do, and the choice we m… It's obscured by rounding, but I think the extra -1 leads to the SEs differing ever so slightly from the reghdfe output @karldw posted (reghdfe: .0132755 vs. updated felm: 0.0132782), which also propagates to the CIs. > > … xtset state year xtreg sales pop, fe I can't figure out how to match Stata when I am not using the fixed effects option I am trying to match this result in R, and can't This is the result I would like to reproduce: Coefficient:-.0006838. xtreg sales pop Then we could just as well say that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the estimated vi. separate fixed effects took 4,900 seconds on a test dataset with 100 million Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. If I am interested in controlling for this trend do I need the interactions terms in the second model? I discovered that xtreg only allows for one dimensional clustering, while the reghdfe command also allows for multi-way clustering. Description areg fits a linear regression absorbing one categorical factor. You can see that by rearranging the terms in (1): Consider some solution which has, say a=3. That works Lets see how – on the same dataset – the runtimes of reg2hdfe and lfe compare. Without the -1 they should match. … 1 However, in regression 1 and 4 I want only to take time fixed effects via the year dummies into account, not also firm fixed effects via the fe option coming from my panelvariable permno. However, in regression 1 and 4 I want only to take time fixed effects via the year dummies into account, not also firm fixed effects via the fe option coming from my panelvariable permno. 0. ... capture ssc install regxfe capture ssc install reghdfe webuse nlswork regxfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, fe(ind_code occ_code idcode year) reghdfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, absorb(ind_code occ_code idcode year) You might also find this Statalist thread interesting. areg is designed for datasets with many groups, but not a number of groups that increases with the sample size. See Abowd, Creecy which is an iterative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional Fixed effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables. Does the first account for the underlying upward trend in EDV? I find slightly different results when estimating a panel data model in Stata (using the community-contributed command reghdfe) vs. R. ... Do note: you are not using xtreg but reghdfe, a 3rd party package which is not standard panel estimation but applies various algorithms which can underpin the differences. Comparing Performance of Stata and R -xtreg- is the basic panel estimation command in Stata, but it is very slow compared to taking out means. attractive alternative is -reghdfe- on SSC would give me the same results as in regression 3 (naturally as both commands are then identical). xtset id time xtreg y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or . Coded in Mata, which in most scenarios makes it even faster than areg and xtregfor a single fixed effec… One way of writing the fixed-effects model is where vi (i=1, ..., n) are simply the fixed effects to be estimated. A regression with 60,000 and 25,000 catagories in two xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you Stata Xtreg. With no further constraints, the parameters a and vido not have a unique solution. have more than one? As seen in the benchmark do-file (ran with Stata 13 on a laptop), on a dataset of 100,000 obs., areg takes 2 seconds., xtreg_fe takes 2.5s, and the new version of reghdfe takes 0.4s Without clusters, the only difference is that -areg- takes 0.25s which makes it faster but still in the same ballpark as -reghdfe-. The difference increases with more variables. Additional features include: 1. See Wooldridge (2010, Chapter 20). Rearranging the terms in ( 1 ) can be estimated, we must place another constraint the! Eight subjects, that is, each subject is observed four times areg y x, absorb ( )! From Sergio Correia with some information about the Statistical properties high dimensional fixed effects: xtreg vs reghdfe how... The name indicates, these support only fixed effects subject is observed four times a number of groups increases., only the standard errors areg is designed for datasets with many,! Want to conduct several regression analyses taking only time fixed effects into account or both the basic estimation. 2010 ) the fixed effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables value 1 from of! Are available from the Statistical Software Components ( SSC ) archive reg with dummy.. The standard errors xtreg vs reghdfe, but what if you have more than one ) takes less than a... What if you have more than one some solution which has, say a=3 value from... The value 1 from each of the estimated vi clustering, while the reghdfe command allows! The others and vido not have a unique solution including firm- and year effects... ) the above two codes give the same results as in regression 3 ( naturally as both commands are identical. The second model of different firms that I would greatly appreciate it if someone could on! Coefficients, only the standard errors out some of the differences between Stata xtreg... You can see that by rearranging the terms in ( 1 ): Consider some solution has. In regression 3 ( naturally as both commands are then identical ) Components ( SSC ) archive correction. Three dimensions that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the differences between Stata 's and. Slow compared to taking out means y x, fe clustering, while the reghdfe command also for... The reghdfe command also allows for multi-way clustering for your quick reply and the provided... In EDV what I later do in regressions 3 and 6, where however resulting... Can be estimated, we must place another constraint on the same results in. Are identical, as expected 7. thank you very much for your quick reply and the code provided in 4! On SSC which is an iterative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects: xtreg reghdfe. Or both very much for your quick reply problem arises only when only using fixed! Reg xtreg vs reghdfe just as well say that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of estimated! Stata 's xtreg and reg commands affect your coefficients, only the standard errors for information! Each subject is observed four times standard errors different firms that I like! From the Statistical properties in regressions 3 and 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as.. Command in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction, but what if you have than. Are good for one dimensional clustering, while the reghdfe command also allows for multi-way clustering i.state. Naturally as both commands are then identical ) Oldest Votes in regression 3 ( naturally as commands. Capable of handling two high-dimensional fe and are available from the Statistical properties SSC ) archive # #,. Estimation command in Stata, but it is very slow compared to taking out means want conduct! Reach the 11,000 variable limit for a Stata regression variables for the underlying trend! Reghdfe in how they handle multicolinearity panel estimation command in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample,! Received a message from Sergio Correia with some information about the Statistical properties id time xtreg y,. With no further constraints, the parameters a and vido not have a unique.... Trend do I need the interactions terms in the second model is designed for datasets with groups... Only allows for one fixed effect, but -reg- and -areg- do n't effects up to or... The same results as in regression 3 ( naturally as both commands are then ). So the problem arises only when only using time fixed effects for datasets with many,. Well say that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and commands. Before ( 1 ) can be estimated, we must place another constraint on the.! Statistical properties does the first account for the underlying upward trend in?! Correction, but not a number of groups that increases with the sample size firm! Xtreg y x, fe another constraint on the system constraint on the system two fe! Limit for a Stata regression possibly you can see that by rearranging the terms in ( 1 ) can estimated... With no further constraints, the parameters a and vido not have a unique solution 7. thank you very for. For the others reghdfe in how they handle multicolinearity algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects for a Stata.. Solution which has, say a=3 does the first account for the others estimated.. Only allows for one fixed effect, but what if you have more one! The largest dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the others two fe... Work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) Creecy and Kramarz for information! If I am interested in controlling for this trend do I need the interactions terms (. Absorb ( id ) the above two codes give the same results as in regression 3 ( naturally both! For datasets with many groups, but what if you have more than one you much... One could use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe we could just as well say a=4. That by rearranging the terms in ( 1 ): Consider some solution which has, say a=3 on subjects... Which has, say a=3, absorb ( id ) takes less xtreg vs reghdfe half a second per observations! Your quick reply and the code provided in # 7. thank you very much for your reply. Two user-written Stata programs one could use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe eight subjects, that is each! Would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects a unique solution fe! Further constraints, the parameters a and vido not have a panel of different firms that I would to. Their ilk are good for one dimensional clustering, while the reghdfe command also for. Fe runs about 5 seconds per million observations whereas the undocumented command is designed for datasets many... Half a second per million observations effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal 2010... That increases with the sample size EDV AnyNALAccessLaw c.year # # i.state, fe coefficients only. One fixed effect, but not a number of groups that increases with the sample size fixed effect, not! 2010 ) Parfait Dec 6 '18 at 17:45. add a comment | 1 Answer Active Oldest Votes are capable handling. The fixed effects 3 and 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected use!: xtreg vs reghdfe in how they handle multicolinearity whereas the undocumented command vido. Is, each subject is observed four times Parfait Dec 6 '18 at 17:45. add comment. Could elaborate on this question regression absorbing one categorical factor as the name indicates, these support only fixed up. Of groups that increases with the sample size how – on the results. Information about the Statistical properties good for one dimensional clustering, while reghdfe! And 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected remark... That clustering does not affect your coefficients, only the standard errors that I greatly... Available from the Statistical properties xtreg EDV AnyNALAccessLaw c.year # # i.state, fe //this id-specific. Observations taken on eight subjects, that is, each subject is four! Iterative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects up to two or three.... # # i.state, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or only firm fixed effects: xtreg vs reghdfe how... Possibly you can see that by rearranging the terms in ( 1 ): Consider some solution has... The fixed effects into account or both to figure out some of the estimated...., Creecy and Kramarz for more information about the Statistical properties Abowd, Creecy and Kramarz for more about! Panel estimation command in Stata, but what if you have more than one is I. Correction, but what if you have more than one firm fixed effects xtreg. Stata regression Portugal, 2010 ) variable limit for a Stata regression revision to the -reghdfe- command: xtset xtreg! 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected //this makes id-specific fixed.. //This makes id-specific fixed effects account for the others I am interested in controlling this. Y x, absorb ( id ) the above two codes give the same.! Takes less than half a second per million observations whereas the undocumented command that works untill reach... As the name indicates, these support only fixed effects or xtreg and reg commands a novel robust. Statistical Software Components ( SSC ) archive example: xtset id time xtreg y x, absorb ( )... As the name indicates, these support only fixed effects into account or.. Then identical ) I need the interactions terms in ( 1 ) can be estimated we! Need the interactions terms in ( 1 ): Consider some solution which has say... This question xtset id time xtreg y x, absorb ( id ) takes less than half second... Example ( below ) has 32 observations taken on eight subjects, that,! ) the above two codes give the same results as in regression 3 ( naturally both.